The thing about
apologies is that they are all fine and good when the person apologizing
actually knows what they are apologizing for. Giving someone a blanket
apology, one that is meant to cover "whatever it is I must've done"
is simply a cop-out and not the true intent of what an apology is really for. When one
apologizes, it is supposed to be about feeling and emotion. One must truly understand the wrong, truly
feel the hurt of the other person, and truly be sorry for the offense. The
problem that most apologizers have is that they haven't a clue what they are
sorry for. Hence, the empty apology.
So really what is worse - the initial hurtful action or the fact that the one apologizing simply hasn't a clue that they've acted in such a manner as to hurt another person? Only when one completely understands and feels badly for where they have misstepped can one wholeheartedly expect an "apology accepted."
No comments:
Post a Comment